Govt changes norms to protect independent directors

NEW DELHI: Independent Directors will not be hauled up for the acts undertaken by companies without their consent or knowledge, as per the new norms announced by the government.

“We have directed the Registrar of Companies (RoC) not to take any penal action against those independent directors who are not actively involved in the decision making process of the company,” Corporate Affairs Secretary D K Mittal told PTI.

Under the new norms, no action can be taken against independent directors and nominee directors for acts of companies undertaken without their “consent or connivance or where he has acted diligently in the Board process.”
Ads by Google

Welcoming the decision, Diljeet Titus, senior partner of Titus & Co said, “the decision would insulate independent directors from unnecessary liabilities and would function as effective watchdog without fear or favour”.

Describing the move as a “fair step”, senior corporate lawyer O P Dua said, “The decisions follows a number of petitions filed in the courts against the present provision which holds independent directors liable for omissions committed by the company.”

Under the existing provision, penal actions for defaults committed under the Companies Act, 1956, are taken against an “officer in default” or “directors” or “persons” as specified in the Act.

” RoC has been asked to take extra care in examining the cases where directors are identified as officer in default,” Mittal said quoting a circular.

Some protection, said Titus, was necessary as independent directors perform important functions like ensuring corporate governance, conducting audits and fixing executive remuneration.

The role and responsibility of independent directors have been a topic of constant public debate, especially after the move of Satyam Computer Services to buy out Maytas Infra and Maytas Properties, promoted by kin of the founder B Ramalinga Raju, was rejected by the shareholders.

Subsequent to the event, Raju confessed of committing a Rs 14,000-crore fraud – the largest in India’s corporate history.

As per clause 49 of the Listing Agreement, at least 50 per cent of the members of board of directors should be independent directors. Besides, if the Chairman of the board is a non-executive director, at least one-third of the Board should comprise independent directors.

(PTI)

(No Ratings Yet)

 Loading ...

Posted by indiacsr on Apr 3 2011. Filed under Corporate Governance. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.